Drug-class-specific verification considerations (opioids, amphetamines, cocaine, marijuana/THC, PCP, MDMA), permitted prescriptions, and clinical interpretation of positive results.
A commercial driver’s urine specimen is reported by the laboratory as substituted, with a creatinine of 1.2 mg/dL and a specific gravity of 1.0008. During the verification interview, the driver provides medical documentation of a chronic renal condition and asserts this is the physiological reason for the laboratory findings. The MRO finds the driver's explanation potentially plausible. What is the MRO's most appropriate next step?